Review Articles · Review R1

Direction and Value of the Judicial Identification Reform

Xi Pan

Forensic Science Seminar · 2018 · Volume 8 · Issue 3 · pp. 1–5

Archived journal recordISSN 2157-118XIssue date 15 December 2018
Affiliations
  1. Law School of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.

Corresponding author(s): Xi Pan

Article Summary

Summary

This article discusses the value orientation of judicial-identification reform, emphasizing the dual scientific and legal nature of expert evidence. It considers fairness, efficiency, neutrality, independence and scientific reliability as central values and argues for institutional and management reforms that better allocate resources and protect the integrity of expert evidence.

Keywords: Expert evidence; Judicial justice; Judicial efficiency; Judicial order

Publication History

Received6 June 2018
Revised26 August 2017
Accepted28 October 2018
Available Online1 December 2018

Citation Information

Document codeR1 · Review
JournalForensic Science Seminar
ISSN2157-118X
Volume / Issue8 / 3
Pages1–5
Official issue date15 December 2018
Article HTMLhttps://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.3.R1.html
Full text PDFhttps://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.3.R1.pdf