Review Articles · Review R1
Direction and Value of the Judicial Identification Reform
Peer ReviewedISSN 2157-118XIssue date 15 December 2018
Affiliations
- Law School of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Corresponding author(s): Xi Pan
Article Summary
Summary
This article discusses the value orientation of judicial-identification reform, emphasizing the dual scientific and legal nature of expert evidence. It considers fairness, efficiency, neutrality, independence and scientific reliability as central values and argues for institutional and management reforms that better allocate resources and protect the integrity of expert evidence.
Keywords: Expert evidence; Judicial justice; Judicial efficiency; Judicial order
The scholarly title and author names above are normalized from the source PDF and issue contents. Affiliation superscripts are displayed only through the affiliation list and are not part of any author name.
Publication History
Received6 June 2018
Revised26 August 2017
Accepted28 October 2018
Available Online1 December 2018
Source note: The source PDF prints “Received 6 June 2018” and “Received in revised form 26 August 2017”. Because that chronology is internally inconsistent, both values are retained verbatim and are not silently corrected.
Citation Information
| Document code | R1 · Review |
|---|---|
| Journal | Forensic Science Seminar |
| ISSN | 2157-118X |
| Volume / Issue | 8 / 3 |
| Pages | 1–5 |
| Official issue date | 15 December 2018 |
| Article HTML | https://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.3.R1.html |
| Full text PDF | https://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.3.R1.pdf |