Review Articles · Review R2
Grave Crimes and Weak Evidence: Fact-Finding Evolution in International Criminal Law PART III-IV
Peer ReviewedISSN 2157-118XIssue date 15 December 2018
Affiliations
- William & Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia, U.S.
Corresponding author: Nancy Amoury Combs · ncombs@wm.edu
Article Summary
Summary
Continuing the article published in the preceding issue, this part examines serious testimonial inconsistencies and their implications for fact-finding in international criminal proceedings. It studies variation in witness evidence and judicial responses, contributing to an empirical account of how international criminal courts manage evidentiary weakness.
The scholarly title and author names above are normalized from the source PDF and issue contents. Affiliation superscripts are displayed only through the affiliation list and are not part of any author name.
Publication History
Received4 December 2016
Revised21 November 2017
Accepted10 April 2018
Available Online1 December 2018
Source note: The source PDF contains a KEY WORDS line unrelated to this article; it is omitted from the HTML metadata rather than propagated.
Citation Information
| Document code | R2 · Review |
|---|---|
| Journal | Forensic Science Seminar |
| ISSN | 2157-118X |
| Volume / Issue | 8 / 3 |
| Pages | 6–12 |
| Official issue date | 15 December 2018 |
| Article HTML | https://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.3.R2.html |
| Full text PDF | https://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.3.R2.pdf |