Review Articles · Review R2
Grave Crimes and Weak Evidence: Fact-Finding Evolution in International Criminal Law PART I-II
Peer ReviewedISSN 2157-118XIssue date 30 June 2018
Affiliations
- William & Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia, U.S.
Corresponding author: Nancy Amoury Combs · ncombs@wm.edu
Article Summary
Summary
This article examines the difficulty of reliable fact-finding in international criminal courts. Using empirical evidence, it analyzes problems such as inconsistent, vague and false testimony and considers how international tribunals have adapted their fact-finding practices over time in response to recurring evidentiary challenges.
The scholarly title and author names above are normalized from the source PDF and issue contents. Affiliation superscripts are displayed only through the affiliation list and are not part of any author name.
Publication History
Received4 December 2016
Revised21 November 2017
Accepted10 April 2018
Available Online28 August 2018
Source note: The source PDF contains a KEY WORDS line that is unrelated to this article and appears to have been copied from another paper. It is deliberately omitted from the HTML metadata rather than propagated.
Citation Information
| Document code | R2 · Review |
|---|---|
| Journal | Forensic Science Seminar |
| ISSN | 2157-118X |
| Volume / Issue | 8 / 2 |
| Pages | 12–25 |
| Official issue date | 30 June 2018 |
| Article HTML | https://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.2.R2.html |
| Full text PDF | https://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.2.R2.pdf |