Forensic Science Seminar
Peer-reviewed forensic science journal · Established 2011
ISSN 2157-118XFOREN SCI SEM · Volume 8

Review Articles · Review R1

Development of European Standards for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science — The Gap between Intentions and Perceptions

Alex Biedermann, Christophe Champod, Sheila Willis

Forensic Science Seminar · 2018 · Volume 8 · Issue 2 · pp. 1–11

Peer ReviewedISSN 2157-118XIssue date 30 June 2018
Affiliations
  1. School of Criminal Justice, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
  2. Forensic Science Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Corresponding author: Alex Biedermann · alex.biedermann@unil.ch

Download Article PDFBack to Volume 8, Number 2

Article Summary

Summary

This review discusses European efforts to harmonize evaluative reporting in forensic science, including work associated with ENFSI and related initiatives. It focuses on the gap between intended principles and how they are understood in practice, and considers conceptual, organizational, training and resource barriers to consistent implementation.

Keywords: European context; Evaluative reporting; Forensic evidence; Forensic science

The scholarly title and author names above are normalized from the source PDF and issue contents. Affiliation superscripts are displayed only through the affiliation list and are not part of any author name.

Publication History

Received19 March 2017
Revised18 May 2018
Accepted24 May 2018
Available Online24 August 2018

Citation Information

Document codeR1 · Review
JournalForensic Science Seminar
ISSN2157-118X
Volume / Issue8 / 2
Pages1–11
Official issue date30 June 2018
Article HTMLhttps://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.2.R1.html
Full text PDFhttps://fss.xxyy.info/journal/2018/2157118X.8.2.R1.pdf